Modification of dna on magnetic beads

ABSTRACT

Provided herein is technology related to the chemical modification and purification of DNA. Specifically, the technology provides methods for performing a bisulfate conversion reaction on small amounts of single-stranded, fragmented DNA and performing the subsequent desulfonation and purification steps on magnetic beads.

The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional ApplicationSer. No. 61/592,272, filed Jan. 30, 2011, which is incorporated hereinby reference.

FIELD OF INVENTION

Provided herein is technology related to the chemical modification andpurification of DNA. Specifically, the technology provides methods forperforming a bisulfite conversion reaction on small amounts ofsingle-stranded, fragmented DNA and performing the subsequentdesulfonation and purification steps using magnetic beads, and methodsof recovering modified DNA from beads.

BACKGROUND

DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification that regulates geneexpression and marks imprinted genes. Consequently, aberrant DNAmethylation is known to disrupt embryonic development and cell cycleregulation, and it can promote oncogenesis that produces cancers. Inmammals, methylation occurs only at cytosine residues and morespecifically only on a cytosine residue that is adjacent to a guanineresidue (that is, at the sequence CG, often denoted “CpG”). Detectingand mapping sites of DNA methylation are essential steps forunderstanding epigenetic gene regulation and providing diagnostic toolsfor identifying cancers and other disease states associated with errorsin gene regulation.

Mapping methylation sites is currently accomplished by the bisulfitemethod described by Frommer, et al. for the detection of5-methylcytosines in DNA (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 1827-31 (1992),explicitly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for allpurposes) or variations thereof The bisulfite method of mapping5-methylcytosines is based on the observation that cytosine, but not5-methylcytosine, reacts with hydrogen sulfite ion (also known asbisulfite). The reaction is usually performed according to the followingsteps: first, cytosine reacts with hydrogen sulfite to form a sulfonatedcytosine. Next, spontaneous deamination of the sulfonated reactionintermediate results in a sulfonated uracil. Finally, the sulfonateduracil is desulfonated under alkaline conditions to form uracil.Detection is possible because uracil forms base pairs with adenine (thusbehaving like thymine), whereas 5-methylcytosine base pairs with guanine(thus behaving like cytosine). This makes the discrimination ofmethylated cytosines from non-methylated cytosines possible by, e.g.,bisulfite genomic sequencing (Grigg G, & Clark S, Bioessays (1994) 16:431-36; Grigg G, DNA Seq. (1996) 6: 189-98) or methylation-specific PCR(MSP) as is disclosed, e.g., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,786,146. See also, e.g.,Hayatsu, H., Proc. Jpn. Acad., Ser. B 84, No.8: 321 (2008).

Bisulfite treatment typically requires washing steps and buffer changesto produce a converted and purified DNA sample for analysis.Conventional technologies use a variety of approaches to facilitatethese steps, e.g., spin columns, ethanol purification, and solidsupports. However, methods using silica spin columns or ethanolpurification often result in sample losses that compromise theusefulness of the bisulfite method as a quantitative measure of cytosinemethylation. Moreover, though some improvements have been developedusing solid supports, these methods require large amounts of DNA asinput and also suffer from problems of sample loss and reproducibility.Consequently, conventional methods provide only qualitative measures ofDNA methylation. In practice, current methods are generally adapted forsequencing the bisulfite-converted products or for detecting a PCRamplicon only as an end-product, without quantification. Additionally,conventional methods often require long times (e.g., 1-2 days) tocomplete (e.g., in part due to long incubation times) and do not providean efficient conversion and recovery of the converted DNA. Methodsemploying spin columns are labor-intensive and are not readily amenableto automation and thus incorporation into clinical laboratory workflow.

Moreover, conventional bisulfite sequencing often results in thedegradation of DNA due to the conditions necessary for completeconversion, such as long incubation times, elevated temperatures, andhigh bisulfite concentrations. These conditions depurinate DNA,resulting in random strand breaks that can lead to the degradation of90% of the incubated DNA (see, e.g., Ehrich M, et al. (2007). “A newmethod for accurate assessment of DNA quality after bisulfitetreatment”, Nucleic Acids Res 35(5): e29; Grunau C, et al. (July 2001),“Bisulfite genomic sequencing: systematic investigation of criticalexperimental parameters”, Nucleic Acids Res 29 (13): E65-5). See also,e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 7.413,855. The extensive degradation induced byconventional technologies is problematic, especially for samplescontaining diminishingly low amounts of DNA. Consequently, downstreamanalyses (e.g., PCR and other assays) of such samples are severelycompromised due to a decreased sampling of representative DNA moleculesfrom the sample. This, in turn, precludes the acquisition ofquantitatively accurate information of methylation levels. As such,there is a lack of methods appropriate for the quantitative assessmentof the methylation state of small amounts of DNA.

SUMMARY

Accordingly, provided herein is technology related to the modificationand purification of DNA. Specifically, the technology provides methodsand kits for performing a bisulfite conversion reaction on small amountsof single-stranded, fragmented DNA and performing the subsequentdesulfonation and purification steps using magnetic beads for theefficient purification and recovery of the converted DNA. The methodsuse silica-coated magnetic beads, a stringent high concentration ofguanidine hydrochloride in a binding buffer, and a high concentration ofethanol in wash buffers. In preferred embodiments the binding bufferdoes not include alcohol. The desulfonation and subsequent purificationsteps are carried out on DNA captured on the beads.

The methods generally proceed as follows. First, the magnetic beads arewashed in a binding buffer to remove storage and preservative solution.In a separate reaction, the DNA is subject to bisulfite conversion,e.g., by reaction with a sulfonation reagent such as ammonium hydrogensulfite (see., e.g., Hayatsu, H., Proc. Jpn. Acad., Ser. B 84, No.8: 321(2008)), sodium hydrogen sulfite, or by using a commercial kit. In someembodiments, a high concentration (e.g., a 45% solution) of ammoniumhydrogen sulfite is used as a sulfonation reagent. Thebisulfite-converted DNA and a binding buffer (e.g., 4.0-8.0 M guanidinehydrochloride, e.g., in some embodiments, approximately 7.0 M guanidinehydrochloride) are added to the beads and incubated to bind the DNA tothe beads. In some embodiments, the bead washing and DNA binding stepsare combined in a single step in which an excess amount of bindingbuffer is added to the beads followed by addition of thebisulfite-converted DNA. After binding, the binding solution is removed,the beads are washed, and a desulfonation buffer (e.g., 0.3 N sodiumhydroxide in alcohol) is added. The desulfonation buffer is thenremoved, the beads are washed, and the DNA is eluted in an appropriateDNA elution buffer. The DNA solution is then suitable for a quantitativemeasurement of bisulfite conversion and thus to provide a quantitativemeasure of cytosine methylation.

In some embodiments, the desulfonation reagent comprises isopropylalcohol (isopropanol, 2-propanol, “IPA”), e.g., some embodiments providea desulfonation reagent that comprises approximately 70% isopropanol andapproximately 0.1 N sodium hydroxide.

In some embodiments, the sample vessel in which DNA is captured andwashed is exposed to a protein solution, e.g., bovine serum albumin(BSA) and/or casein. For example, in some embodiments, a solution of BSAand/or casein is added the sample vessel containing magnetic beads,e.g., is included in one or more solutions used to process the DNA(e.g., bisulfite conversion, isolation, and/or purification of the DNA)to reduce or eliminate variation in strand recovery. In some embodimentsthe solution is added to a wash solution used after DNA capture andbefore elution of the strands. In some embodiments, the sample vessel iswherein said sample vessel is a well of a multi-well plate having, e.g.,a plate having 24, 96, 384, or 1536 wells, or any other number of wells.In some embodiments, the methods of the technology are performed in anautomated process, e.g., using robotics and or automated liquidhandling.

In some embodiments, the technology provided herein provides a methodfor recovering nucleic acid from a sample vessel, comprising steps ofbinding nucleic acid in a sample vessel and recovering at least aportion of the nucleic acid from the sample vessel, wherein the samplevessel is exposed to a solution comprising a protein prior to recoveringthe nucleic acid from the vessel. In some embodiments, the solutioncomprises at least one of bovine serum albumin or casein. In someembodiments, the nucleic acid is bound to a particle or bead in thesample vessel, e.g., a silica and/or magnetic bead or particle.

In certain preferred embodiments, the protein solution comprises atleast 5-10 ng/μl bovine serum albumin, preferably at least 10 ng/μl. Insome embodiments, the solution comprises not more than 100 ng/μl bovineserum albumin. In some embodiments, the solution comprises between about0.001% and about 0.01% casein. In preferred embodiments, the methodcomprises the recovering of the nucleic acid from the sample wellcomprises eluting the nucleic acid from a bead or particle in thevessel.

In certain embodiments of the technology, the exposure of the samplevessel to the protein solution occurs after the nucleic acid is bound inthe sample vessel, while in other embodiments, the sample vessel isexposed to the solution before the nucleic acid is bound in the vessel.In some embodiments, the nucleic acid is bisulfite treated DNA, and themethod comprises desulfonating DNA bound in the sample vessel before thesample vessel is exposed to the protein solution. In other embodiments,the vessel is exposed to the protein prior to desulfonation of the boundDNA.

The technology provides embodiments of the methods for treating DNAcomprising contacting a DNA with a bisulfite reagent and binding the DNAto a magnetic bead in a binding buffer. Some embodiments provideadditional steps, e.g., washing the DNA with a first wash buffer.Additional embodiments further provide methods comprising contacting theDNA with a desulfonation reagent, washing the DNA with a wash buffer,and eluting the DNA with an elution buffer to produce an analyticalsample. In some embodiments, the binding buffer comprises approximately7 M guanidine hydrochloride and in some embodiments a single wash bufferis used that comprises approximately 80% ethanol and 10 mM Tris HCl at apH of approximately 8.0.

One aspect of the technology relates to the bisulfite conversion of DNAfragments, e.g., small DNAs of approximately 200 bases or less inlength. Accordingly, in some embodiments the DNA subject to bisulfitetreatment comprises or consists of a population of DNA strands of 200 orfewer nucleotides in length. Moreover, in some embodiments the DNA issingle stranded. Another aspect of the technology provides for theefficient processing and recovery of DNA, e.g., to provide aquantitative measure of cytosine methylation in a sample following abisulfite reaction. In some embodiments are thus provided methods inwhich a first amount of DNA in the contacting step is substantially thesame as a second amount of DNA in the analytical sample and/or thesecond amount reflects a near-complete recovery of the first amountafter accounting for an appropriate concentration or dilution factor. Asa method to treat DNA with bisulfite to convert cytosines, but notmethylcytosines, to uracil, some embodiments provide that a cytosine, ifpresent in the DNA, is converted to a uracil. In addition, someembodiments thus provide that a methylcytosine, if present in the DNA,is not converted to a uracil. While the technology is not limited in thetypes of beads that are used, in some embodiments the magnetic bead is asilica-coated magnetic bead and in some embodiments the bead has adiameter of approximately 1 μm.

Further provided are kits for performing the bisulfite conversion of DNAto quantify the methylation of DNA. In some embodiments, the technologyprovides embodiments of a kit comprising a sulfonation reagent, amagnetic bead, a binding buffer, a wash buffer, or an elution buffer. Insome embodiments of the kits provided, the binding buffer comprisesapproximately 7 M guanidine hydrochloride and is free of alcohol. Insome embodiments, the sulfonation reagent is an ammonium hydrogensulfite reagent. In some embodiments, the ammonium hydrogen sulfitesulfonation reagent comprises isopropanol.

In some embodiments, it is to be understood that one or more solutionsof the kit are to be provided by the user of the kit. For example, insome embodiments a wash buffer is not included in the kit and issupplied by the user of the kit. Kits according to embodiments of thetechnology comprise a sample tube, an instruction for use, andpackaging.

In one aspect, embodiments of the technology provided herein relate tomethods of isolating small nucleic acids (e.g., double- orsingle-stranded DNA consisting of 200 or fewer bases). Such isolationfinds use, for example, in the treatment of DNA with bisulfite reagentsto quantify DNA methylation. In some embodiments, isolation of smallmolecules of DNA comprises the use of a DNA binding buffer comprisingguanidine hydrochloride and no alcohol. In some embodiments, capture ofDNA involves the use of magnetic beads.

Additional embodiments of the technology provided herein will beapparent to persons skilled in the relevant art based on the teachingscontained herein.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the presenttechnology will become better understood with regard to the followingdrawings:

FIG. 1 is a flowchart describing a process for desulfonatingbisulfite-treated DNA, in accordance with embodiments of the technologyprovided herein.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart describing a process for desulfonatingbisulfite-treated DNA, in accordance with embodiments of the technologyprovided herein.

FIG. 3A-B shows plots of data from experiments comparing thequantitative measurement of DNA methylation as determined by twodifferent protocols. FIG. 3A shows the results of experiments comparingusing magnetic beads and a binding buffer as described in the methods,using magnetic beads and using spin columns. Four measurements wereperformed for each set of conditions. FIG. 3B shows plots of data from arepeat of the experiments that produced the data shown in FIG. 3A.

FIG. 4 shows plots of data from experiments to test guanidinehydrochloride binding buffers. FIG. 4A shows the results of experimentscomparing binding buffers having 4.5 to 8.0 M guanidine hydrochloridewithout alcohol, and FIG. 4B shows averages of values for replicates inFIG. 4A.

FIG. 5 shows plots of data from experiments to test guanidinehydrochloride binding buffers. FIG. 5A shows the results of experimentscomparing buffers having 5.5 to 7.0 M guanidine hydrochloride withoutalcohol, and FIG. 5B shows averages of values for replicates in FIG. 5A.

FIG. 6 shows a plot of data from experiments testing NaOH and ethanolconcentrations in the desulfonation buffer. The results shown areaverages of duplicate runs of a positive pool of stool DNA (sDNA) thatwas converted with 34% ABS at 68° C. for 1 hour followed by silica beadpurification and desulfonation. In each group of bars, the order of thebars from left to right is the same as in the legend from top to bottom.

FIG. 7 shows a plot of data from experiments to evaluate desulfonationtime. The results shown are averages of duplicate runs of a positivepool of sDNA converted with 34% ABS at 68° C. for 1 hour followed bysilica bead purification and desulfonation. In each group of bars, theorder of the bars from left to right is the same as in the legend fromtop to bottom.

FIG. 8 shows a table comparing the amounts of nucleic acid recoveredfrom 96 replicate wells on a 96 deep-well plate. The recovery of NDRG4strands from each well of the plate varied as a function of wellposition, with the general trend of progressively greater recovery fromthe top (row A) to the bottom (row H) of the plate.

FIG. 9 shows tables comparing the amounts of nucleic acid recovered fromreplicate wells in which the captured strands were washed with either 10mM Tris 0.1 mM EDTA (“Te”) or a protein solution (BSA) prior to elution.

FIG. 10 shows a table comparing the effects of different concentrationsof BSA solution on the average number of strands of NDRG-4 or KRAS-38synthetic small DNA recovered from a 96-deep well plate, when the assaywells are exposed to the BSA solution prior to elution of thebisulfite-converted DNA. These data are averaged signals for 16replicate QuARTS assay reactions.

FIG. 11 compares the effects of different concentrations of BSA andcasein solutions on the average number of strands of in KRAS and ANBpanel synthetic small DNAs recovered from 96 deep-well plates, when theassay wells are exposed to the protein solutions prior to elution of thebisulfite-converted DNA. In the ANB panel, which consists of ACTB(β-actin, which typically serves as a reference standard in the assays),NDRG4 (member of the N-myc downregulated gene family), and BMP3 (bonemorphogenetic protein 3), “FAM” signal indicates the NDRG4 target, “HEX”indicates the BMP3 target, and QSR (Quasar 670) indicates the ACTBtarget. In the KRAS assays, the FAM signal indicates KRAS 35T, 34T, 38targets, HEX indicates KRAS 35A, 35C, 34A 34C targets, and QSR indicatesACTB targets. These data are averaged signals for 46 replicate QuARTSassay reactions.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Provided herein is technology related to the chemical modification andpurification of DNA. Specifically, the technology provides methods forperforming a bisulfite conversion reaction on small amounts ofsingle-stranded, fragmented DNA and performing the subsequentdesulfonation and purification steps using magnetic beads. Moreover, themethods provide conditions that promote a highly stable binding of theDNA to the beads. This facilitates the efficient recovery ofbisulfite-treated DNA despite the highly basic reaction conditions ofdesulfonation that one of skill in the art would expect to disrupt theinteraction of the DNA with the beads. By combination of the innovativesteps provided herein, the technology provides methods for preparingbisulfite-converted DNA quickly, in less than 2 hours, with complete ornearly complete recovery of the input DNA.

The technology is related to the experimental findings described belowand developed in the experimental examples. These examples describe thedevelopment and testing of reagents used for the analysis of themethylation state of a nucleic acid. In particular, the technology isrelated to desulfonation buffers comprising isopropanol, alcohol-freebinding buffers, and the use of bovine serum albumin and/or casein invarious buffers to minimize or eliminate variation in well-to-wellstrand recoveries when assays are performed in a high-throughput formatsuch as in a 96 deep-well plate. Desulfonation buffers comprisingisopropanol solved some problems associated with the use ofdesulfonation buffers comprising ethanol (e.g., precipitate formation).In addition, assays using binding buffers made without an alcoholproduced results with less variability compared to assays usingconventional binding buffers comprising an alcohol such as isopropanolor ethanol.

Definitions

To facilitate an understanding of the present technology, a number ofterms and phrases are defined below. Additional definitions are setforth throughout the detailed description.

Throughout the specification and claims, the following terms take themeanings explicitly associated herein, unless the context clearlydictates otherwise. The phrase “in one embodiment” as used herein doesnot necessarily refer to the same embodiment, though it may.Furthermore, the phrase “in another embodiment” as used herein does notnecessarily refer to a different embodiment, although it may. Thus, asdescribed below, various embodiments of the invention may be readilycombined, without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.

In addition, as used herein, the term “or” is an inclusive “or” operatorand is equivalent to the term “and/or” unless the context clearlydictates otherwise. The term “based on” is not exclusive and allows forbeing based on additional factors not described, unless the contextclearly dictates otherwise. In addition, throughout the specification,the meaning of “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural references. Thus, “a”or “an” or “the” can mean one or more than one. For example, “a” widgetcan mean one widget or a plurality of widgets. The meaning of “in”includes “in” and “on.”

As used herein, a “DNA fragment” or “small DNA” or “short DNA” means aDNA that consists of no more than approximately 200 bp. A small DNA maybe in a mixture with longer DNAs.

As used herein, the term “genome” refers to the genetic material (e.g.,chromosomes) of an organism or a cell.

As used herein, “sulfonated DNA” refers to the intermediate bisulfitereaction product that is a DNA comprising cytosines or uracils that havebeen sulfonated as a result of bisulfite treatment.

As used herein, a “small amount” of a DNA means less than about 100,000molecules of that DNA or one or more DNAs having substantially the samefunctional sequence.

As used herein, the terms “hydrogen sulfite” and “bisulfite” areinterchangeable.

As used herein, the terms “magnetic particles” and “magnetic beads” areused interchangeably and refer to particles or beads that respond to amagnetic field. Typically, magnetic particles comprise materials thathave no magnetic field but that form a magnetic dipole when exposed to amagnetic field, e.g., materials capable of being magnetized in thepresence of a magnetic field but that are not themselves magnetic in theabsence of such a field. The term “magnetic” as used in this contextincludes materials that are paramagnetic or superparamagnetic materials.The term “magnetic”, as used herein, also encompasses temporarilymagnetic materials, such as ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic materialswith low Curie temperatures, provided that such temporarily magneticmaterials are paramagnetic in the temperature range at which silicamagnetic particles containing such materials are used according to thepresent methods to isolate biological materials.

As used herein, the term “kit” refers to any delivery system fordelivering materials. In the context of nucleic acid purificationsystems and reaction assays, such delivery systems include systems thatallow for the storage, transport, or delivery of reagents and devices(e.g., inhibitor adsorbants, particles, denaturants, oligonucleotides,spin filters etc. in the appropriate containers) and/or supportingmaterials (e.g., buffers, written instructions for performing aprocedure, etc.) from one location to another. For example, kits includeone or more enclosures (e.g., boxes) containing the relevant reactionreagents and/or supporting materials. As used herein, the term“fragmented kit” refers to a delivery system comprising two or moreseparate containers that each contains a subportion of the total kitcomponents. The containers may be delivered to the intended recipienttogether or separately. For example, a first container may contain anmaterials for sample collection and a buffer, while a second containercontains capture oligonucleotides and denaturant. The term “fragmentedkit” is intended to encompass kits containing Analyte specific reagents(ASR's) regulated under section 520(e) of the Federal Food, Drug, andCosmetic Act, but are not limited thereto. Indeed, any delivery systemcomprising two or more separate containers that each contains asubportion of the total kit components are included in the term“fragmented kit.” In contrast, a “combined kit” refers to a deliverysystem containing all of the components of a reaction assay in a singlecontainer (e.g., in a single box housing each of the desiredcomponents). The term “kit” includes both fragmented and combined kits.

The term “system” as used herein refers to a collection of articles foruse for a particular purpose. In some embodiments, the articles compriseinstructions for use, as information supplied on e.g., an article, onpaper, or on recordable media (e.g., diskette, CD, flash drive, etc.).In some embodiments, instructions direct a user to an online location,e.g., a website.

Embodiments of the Technology

The methods described herein provide for a surprisingly effective andefficient bisulfite conversion of very small amounts of single-strandedDNA fragments, and recovery of the converted product. It was discoveredthat treatment of DNA fragments using the demethylation protocolsdescribed herein, followed by binding the DNA to silica-coated magneticbeads (e.g., as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,296,937, incorporatedherein by reference in its entirety for all purposes, and providedcommercially as MagneSil Paramagnetic Particles (catalogue numberAS1220), Promega, Madison, Wis.; promega.com) for desulfonation andwashing allowed for improved reproducibility (approximately 10%variability), higher DNA yields (approximately 1.10× to 1.25× more yieldrelative to conventional technologies, e.g., a spin column method), anddecreased processing time (approximately 100 minutes) relative toconventional technologies. Some embodiments of these methods compriseuse of a stringent binding buffer and a wash buffer comprising 80%ethanol and 10 mM Tris HCl at pH 8. Elution of converted DNA isperformed using an elution buffer.

The embodiments described herein find application in nucleic acid from anumber of sources, including but not limited to stool samples. Methodsof isolating and purifying DNA for use in and with the embodimentsdescribed below are found, for example in PCT Patent Publication WO2012/155072, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety,for all purposes.

Additional embodiments of the technology were developed as a result ofexperiments comprising use of an alcohol-free binding buffer ofguanidine hydrochloride. Specific embodiments of the technology areprovided below.

Sulfonation of DNA

Experiments conducted during the development of embodiments of thetechnology provided herein demonstrated that sulfonation of DNA withammonium bisulfite (ammonium hydrogen sulfite) provides for efficientsulfonation of DNA in a shorter time than sulfonation with sodiumbisulfite (sodium hydrogen sulfite). For example, conventional methodsfor the sulfonation of DNA comprise long, typically overnight,incubations in sodium bisulfite, e.g., for 16 hours or more (see, e.g.,Frommer M et al. (1992), “A genomic sequencing protocol that yields apositive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, USA. 89:1827-31).

Embodiments of the methods described herein provide for sulfonation ofDNA in shorter times (e.g., approximately no more than 1 hour,approximately no more than 2 hours, less than 8 hours, less than 16hours) by incubation with ammonium bisulfite. Consequently, thetechnology provided herein reduces the time of the sulfonation reactionand the total time to produce an analytical sample relative toconventional technologies.

Magnetic Beads

The technology provided herein relates to the bisulfite treatment andisolation of DNA for a quantitative measure of DNA methylation. In someembodiments, magnetic beads are used for the treatment and isolation ofDNA, e.g., beads comprising a magnetic core and a silica coating. Thesilica coating binds DNA and the magnetic core provides an efficient wayto concentrate and isolate the beads (and bound DNA) using a magnet. Insome embodiments, the silica-coated magnetic beads are MagneSilParamagnetic Particles (Promega, Madison, Wis.; catalogue number AS1220or AS640A, promega.com).

The technology is not limited to any particular type of magnetic bead.Embodiments of the technology described herein make use of any magneticbeads (e.g., paramagnetic beads) that have an affinity for nucleicacids. In some embodiments, the magnetic beads have a magnetite (e.g.,Fe₃O₄) core and a coating comprising silicon dioxide (SiO₂). The beadstructure (e.g., size, porosity, shape) and composition of the solutionin which a nucleic acid is bound to the bead can be altered to binddifferent types (e.g., DNA or RNA in single stranded, double stranded,or other forms or conformations; nucleic acids derived from a naturalsource, synthesized chemically, synthesized enzymatically (e.g., byPCR)) and sizes of nucleic acids (e.g., small oligomers, primers,genomic, plasmids, fragments (e.g., consisting of 200 or fewer bases)selectively. These characteristics of the beads affect the binding andelution of the nucleic acids to the beads. Related technologies aredescribed, e.g., in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,194,562; 6,270,970; 6,284,470;6,368,800; 6,376,194, each incorporated herein by reference. Alsocontemplated are magnetic beads coated with, e.g., organosilane (asdescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,554,088); carboxylated polyacrylate (asdescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,648,124); cellulose (as described in U.S.patent application Ser. No. 10/955,974); hydroxysilane (as described inU.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/459,541); and hydrophobic aliphaticligands (as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/221,750),each incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.

The technology is not limited to a particular size of magnetic bead.Accordingly, embodiments of the technology use magnetic beads of anumber of different sizes. Smaller beads provide more surface area (perweight unit basis) for adsorption, but smaller beads are limited in theamount of magnetic material that can be incorporated in the bead corerelative to a larger bead. In some embodiments, the particles aredistributed over a range of sizes with a defined average or median sizeappropriate for the technology for which the beads are used. In someembodiments, the particles are of a relatively narrow monodal particlesize distribution.

In some embodiments, the beads that find use in the present technologyhave pores that are accessible from the exterior of the particle. Suchpores have a controlled size range that is sufficiently large to admit anucleic acid, e.g., a DNA fragment, into the interior of the particleand to bind to the interior surface of the pores. The pores are designedto provide a large surface area that is capable of binding a nucleicacid. Moreover, in one aspect the technology is not limited to anyparticular method of nucleic acid (e.g., DNA) binding and/or isolation.Thus, in some embodiments, aspects of the technology relating to thebisulfite reaction are combined with other suitable methods of DNAisolation (e.g., precipitation, column chromatography (e.g., a spincolumn), etc.).

The beads (and bound material) are removed from a mixture using amagnetic field. In some embodiments, other forms of external force inaddition to a magnetic field are used to isolate the biological targetsubstance according to the present technology. For example, suitableadditional forms of external force include, but are not limited to,gravity filtration, vacuum filtration, and centrifugation.

Embodiments of the technology apply an external magnetic field to removethe complex from the medium. Such a magnetic field can be suitablygenerated in the medium using any one of a number of different knownmeans. For example, one can position a magnet on the outer surface of acontainer of a solution containing the beads, causing the particles tomigrate through the solution and collect on the inner surface of thecontainer adjacent to the magnet. The magnet can then be held inposition on the outer surface of the container such that the particlesare held in the container by the magnetic field generated by the magnet,while the solution is decanted out of the container and discarded. Asecond solution can then be added to the container, and the magnetremoved so that the particles migrate into the second solution.Alternatively, a magnetizable probe could be inserted into the solutionand the probe magnetized, such that the particles deposit on the end ofthe probe immersed in the solution. The probe could then be removed fromthe solution, while remaining magnetized, immersed into a secondsolution, and the magnetic field discontinued permitting the particlesgo into the second solution. Commercial sources exist for magnetsdesigned to be used in both types of magnetic removal and transfertechniques described in general terms above. See, e.g., MagneSphereTechnology Magnetic Separation Stand or the PolyATract Series 9600™Multi-Magnet, both available from Promega Corporation; MagnetightSeparation Stand (Novagen, Madison, Wis.); or Dynal Magnetic ParticleConcentrator (Dynal, Oslo, Norway). Some embodiments comprise use of amagnetic device according to U.S. patent application Ser. No.13/089,116, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entiretyfor all purposes. Furthermore, some embodiments contemplate the use of a“jet channel” or pipet tip magnet separation (e.g., as described in U.S.Pat. Nos. 5,647,994 and 5,702,950). Some embodiments contemplate the useof an immersed probe approach (e.g., as described in U.S. Pat. Nos.6,447,729 and 6,448,092), e.g., as exemplified by the KingFisher systemscommercially available from Thermo Scientific.

Alcohol-Free Binding Buffer

Some embodiments relate to the use of an alcohol-free binding buffer.Experiments conducted during the development of embodiments of thetechnologies described herein demonstrated that an alcohol-free bindingbuffer (e.g., approximately 6.5-7.5 M guanidine hydrochloride, e.g., 7 Mguanidine hydrochloride) performed substantially better than aconventional binding buffer (e.g., approximately 3.6 M guanidinethiocyanate; 10 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.0; 40% 2-propanol). Compare, e.g.,Examples 3 and 5 (see, e.g., FIGS. 3A and 3B) with Examples 6 and 7(FIGS. 4 and 5), each of which used approximately the same quantity ofinput DNA. The signals achieved using the alcohol-free binding bufferare approximately 1.5 to 2-fold higher than those from thealcohol-containing buffer. The experiments show that recovery of thereaction products using the improved binding buffer provides for aquantitative method of measuring DNA methylation.

The technology contemplates the use of other compositions in the bindingbuffer, e.g., other salts such as chaotropic salts. Chaotropic salts aresalts of chaotropic ions. Such salts are highly soluble in aqueoussolutions. The chaotropic ions provided by such salts, at sufficientlyhigh concentration in aqueous solutions of proteins or nucleic acids,cause proteins to unfold, nucleic acids to lose secondary structure or,in the case of double-stranded nucleic acids, melt (e.g.,strand-separate). Without being bound by theory, and with anunderstanding that practice of the technology does not depend on anyparticular mechanism, it is thought that chaotropic ions have theseeffects because they disrupt hydrogen-bonding networks that exist inliquid water and thereby make denatured proteins and nucleic acidsthermodynamically more stable than their correctly folded or structuredcounterparts. Chaotropic ions include, for example, guanidinium, iodide,perchlorate, and trichloroacetate. In some embodiments, e.g., asdescribed above for the present technology, the salt is a salt of theguanidinium ion. Embodiments of the technology include other saltsincluding guanidine hydrochloride, guanidine thiocyanate (which issometimes referred to as guanidine isothiocyanate or guanidiniumisothiocyanate), sodium iodide, sodium perchlorate, and sodiumtrichloroacetate. The concentration of salts or chaotropic ions incompositions formed according to the present technologies is generallybetween about 0.1 M and 8 M and in the embodiments of the technology issufficiently high to cause the biological target material to adhere tothe silica magnetic particles in the mixture, but not so high as tosubstantially denature, to degrade, or to cause the target material toprecipitate out of the mixture.

Isopropanol Desulfonation Buffer

Some embodiments provided herein relate to the use of a desulfonationbuffer comprising isopropanol. Experiments conducted during thedevelopment of the technologies described herein demonstrated that adesulfonation buffer comprising isopropanol minimized or eliminated someproblems associated with the use of desulfonation buffers comprisingethanol. For example, experiments demonstrated that desulfonationbuffers comprising ethanol formed precipitates under some conditions.Under the same or similar conditions, desulfonation buffers comprisingisopropanol did not form a precipitate. Desulfonation buffers comprisingisopropanol find use, e.g., in an automated process where precipitatescould compromise the assay of methylation state and/or harm automatedequipment performing liquid handling and data collected for the tests.

Solutions Comprising BSA or Casein

Some embodiments provided herein relate to the use of solutionscomprising BSA or casein. Experiments conducted during the developmentof technologies described herein demonstrated that adding BSA or caseinto samples minimized or eliminated a variation in strand recovery as afunction of well location in a multi-well plate. Moreover, the additionof

BSA or casein to samples prior to eluting captured DNA resulted in anincreased recovery of strands relative to elutions performed in theabsence of BSA or casein. Solutions comprising BSA and/or casein finduse in washing or treating the vessel surface prior to use for an assay.Exemplary vessels are, e.g., a vial, a well of a multi-well plate suchas a 96 deep-well plate, a tube, etc. Vessels may be made of glass,plastic (e.g., polycarbonate, polystyrene), paper, metal, rubber, etc.In some embodiments, BSA and/or casein is added to wash solutions orother solutions used in embodiments of the methods described herein. Forexample, after capture and desulfonation of DNA on beads, someembodiments provide for washing the beads, sample vessel, etc. with asolution comprising BSA and/or casein during the purification and/orelution steps of the methods described herein.

In some embodiments, solutions comprising BSA and/or casein and relatedmethods of using BSA and/or casein to treat, manipulate, and/or recovernucleic acids are applied to normalize the recovery of nucleic acidsamples in some vessels relative to other vessels (e.g., the individualwells of a 96-well assay plate). For instance, during the development ofembodiments of the technology provided herein, the recovery of nucleicacids from a 96-well assay plate varied as a function of well positionwithin the plate. Accordingly, provided herein is technology comprisingthe use of BSA and/or casein in solutions (e.g., that are added prior tothe elution of a nucleic acid) that normalizes the recovery of thenucleic acids from the wells of the 96-well plate (e.g., by increasingthe recovery of nucleic acid from wells that would otherwise be reducedin the absence of BSA and/or casein).

Analyzing Bisulfite Reaction Products

In some embodiments, the recovered desulfonated product is analyzed. Insome embodiments, the analysis comprises direct sequencing,pyrosequencing, methylation-sensitive single-strand conformationanalysis (MS-SSCA), high resolution melting analysis,methylation-sensitive single-nucleotide primer extension (MS-SnuPE),base-specific cleavage/mass spectrometry (e.g., by MALDI-TOF),methylation-specific PCR (MSP), microarray analysis, restriction digestanalysis, QuARTS assay (described in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos.12/946,737; 12/946,745; and 12/946,752, incorporated herein by referencein their entireties for all purposes), INVADER assay, combined bisulfiterestriction analysis, or methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP).These and other methods are reviewed in more detail in, e.g., Fraga M F& Esteller M (2002), “DNA methylation: a profile of methods andapplications”, BioTechniques 33(3): 632, 634, 636-49; El-Maarri O(2003), “Methods: DNA methylation”, Advances in Experimental Medicineand Biology 544: 197-204; Laird P W (2003), “The power and the promiseof DNA methylation markers”, Nat. Rev. Cancer 3(4): 253-66; Callinan P A& Feinberg A P (2006), “The emerging science of epigenomics”, Hum MolGenet 15(90001): R95-101, which are all incorporated by reference intheir entireties for all purposes.

Automation

In one aspect, the technology described herein is amenable toautomation, e.g., processing without extensive or any humanintervention, e.g., by robotics, computer-control, etc. As such, someembodiments relate to the use of ammonium bisulfite, magnetic beads,alcohol-free binding buffer, isopropanol desulfonation buffer, and/orsolutions comprising casein in an automated method or system forprocessing nucleic acids, e.g., in assays to evaluate the methylationstate of a nucleic acid.

Isolation of Small DNA Fragments

Experimental data collected during the development of the technologydemonstrated that the technology described provides for the efficientrecovery of short DNA molecules from a solution. Accordingly,embodiments of the technology provided herein relate to the purificationand quantitative isolation (e.g., greater than 90% recovery, greaterthan 95% recovery, preferably greater than 97% recovery, and mostpreferably more than 99% recovery) of small nucleic acid (e.g., DNA)fragments. The technology comprises both the efficient capture of DNA bythe beads and the efficient release of the isolated DNA from the beads,both under conditions manipulable by a user of the technology to effect,as desired, binding and release as appropriate for the application. Insome embodiments, an alcohol-free binding buffer comprising guanidinehydrochloride finds use in the technology.

Specific Embodiments

An example of a specific embodiment of the method, as illustrated inFIG. 1, comprises steps performed as follows. The magnetic beads (e.g.,45-50 μl, e.g., 50 μl) are pipetted into a 2-ml tube, placed on amagnet, and the preservative storage solution is discarded. Then, thebeads are suspended and mixed with 200-300 μl (e.g., approximately 250μl) of binding buffer to wash away any residual storage solution. Thebinding buffer is then discarded, and bisulfite-converted DNA (e.g.,100-200 μl, e.g., 150 μl) and binding buffer (e.g., 450-550 μl, e.g.,500 μl) are added to the beads and incubated while mixing for 10-20minutes (e.g., 15 minutes) to allow for the efficient binding of the DNAto the beads. After binding, the beads are placed on a magnet andsubstantially all of the solution is removed, replaced withapproximately 150-250 μl (e.g., 200 μl) of desulfonation buffer, andmixed for 1-10 minutes (e.g., approximately 5 minutes). Thedesulfonation buffer is then removed by placing the tube on a magnet andremoving the supernatant. After this step, the beads are washed oncewith binding buffer and twice with wash buffer, allowed to dry to removeresidual ethanol by evaporation, and then the DNA is eluted from thebeads at 60-70° C. (e.g., 65° C.) for 25-35 minutes (e.g., 30 minutes)using a solution comprising approximately 10 mM Tris-HCl, 0.1 mM EDTA,and 20 ng/μl tRNA, at pH 8.0.

A second specific embodiment is illustrated in FIG. 2. This embodimentprovides a method comprising the following steps. First, the magneticbeads (e.g., 45-50 μl, e.g., 50 μl) are pipetted into a 2-ml tube. Then,the beads are mixed with 700-800 μl (e.g., 750 μl of an alcohol-freebinding buffer (e.g., approximately 7 M guanidine hydrochloride) andbisulfite-converted DNA (100-200 μl, e.g., 150 μl). The mixture isincubated with mixing for 25-35 minutes (e.g., approximately 30 minutes)to allow for the efficient binding of the DNA to the beads. Afterbinding, the beads are placed on a magnet and substantially all of thesolution is removed, replaced with 900-1100 μl (e.g., 1000 μl) of washbuffer and mixed for 1-10 minutes (e.g., approximately 5 minutes). Thenthe wash buffer is removed by placing the solution on a magnet andremoving the supernatant. Next, 150-250 μl (e.g., 200 μl) ofdesulfonation buffer is added and mixed for 1-10 minutes (e.g.,approximately 5 minutes). The desulfonation buffer is then removed byplacing the tube on a magnet and removing the supernatant. After thisstep, the beads are washed twice with wash buffer (e.g., 80% ethanol; 10mM Tris HCl, pH 8.0), allowed to dry to remove residual ethanol byevaporation, and then the DNA is eluted from the beads, e.g., byincubation at 25-35° C. (e.g., at approximately 30° C.) for 30-45minutes using an elution solution (e.g., a solution comprising 10 mMTris-HCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 20 ng/μl tRNA, at pH 8.0).

In some embodiments, one or more solutions used for the processing(e.g., capture wash, capture elution, conversion, and/or purification)of DNA comprises BSA and/or casein to minimize or eliminate a systematic(e.g., top-to-bottom, left-to-right) trending pattern of variation ofstrand recovery (e.g., up to approximately threefold) as a function ofwell location (e.g., by column and/or by row) in a multi-well plate(e.g., a 96-well plate, e.g., a deep-well place) and/or to increasestrand recovery.

Although the disclosure herein refers to certain illustratedembodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are presentedby way of example and not by way of limitation. While the detaileddescription describes the technology as it generally relates to nucleicacids, the detailed description of this particular aspect of the presentinvention is not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Thepresent disclosure provides sufficient guidance to enable one ofordinary skill in the art of the present invention to use the methods ofthe present invention to isolate biological target materials other thannucleic acid materials, e.g., proteins or antibodies.

EXPERIMENTAL EXAMPLES Example 1 Testing Conventional Technology

During the development of embodiments of the technology provided herein,experiments demonstrated that desulfonation and purification ofsulfonated DNA using magnetic beads (Promega MagneSil ParamagneticParticles, Promega catalogue number AS 1050) and standard reactionconditions recommended by the commercial supplier (binding buffer: 3 Mguanidine thiocyanate and 50% isopropyl alcohol; wash buffer 1: 3 Mguanidine thiocyanate and 40% isopropyl alcohol; wash buffer 2: 25%ethanol, 25% isopropyl alcohol, and 0.1 M NaCl) resulted in highlyvariable recovery of processed samples when tested by several users onthe same day or different days.

Example 2 Testing Different Types of Magnetic Beads

During the development of embodiments of the technology provided herein,a different type of beads was used to test if reproducibility andrecovery would improve. For these experiments, Agencourt RNAClean XPmagnetic beads were used (Beckman Coulter Genomics, catalogue numberA63987). Desulfonation and purification of bisulfite-reacted DNA usingthese beads resulted in lesser variability than using the MagneSil beadsunder the conditions of Example 1, but the beads produced a poorrecovery (e.g., a greater than 50-70% loss of DNA).

Example 3 Testing Different Buffer Stringencies

During the development of embodiments of the technology provided herein,the silica-coated magnetic beads used in Example 1 were retested using amodified and more stringent binding buffer comprising 3.6 M guanidinethiocyanate and 50% isopropyl alcohol, an initial wash buffer comprising3 M guanidine thiocyanate and 50% isopropyl alcohol, and a last stepwash buffer comprising 80% ethanol and 10 mM Tris-HCl at pH 8. Use ofthis protocol resulted in a recovery that was greater than 110% comparedto the conventional spin-column method and yielded more reproducibleintra- and inter-experiment data.

Example 4

Testing Methods with Fewer Steps and Decreased Processing Time

During the development of embodiments of the technology provided herein,the silica-coated magnetic beads protocol of Example 3 was modified tolessen the amount of time required for satisfactory performance (e.g.,considering reproducibility, efficiency, and recovery). Initially, theprotocol required 2.5 hours to complete. After decreasing the number offinal wash steps from three to two, this showed no effect on therecovery of DNA. Then, wash buffer 1 was combined with the bindingbuffer, and it was found that use of this modified binding bufferminimally affected the DNA recovery and reproducibility. Various bindingand elution times and temperatures were also tried. Experiments showedthat lowering the elution temperature from 85° C. to 65° C. andincubating for 20 minutes and decreasing the binding time from 30 to 15minutes resulted in satisfactory recovery of DNA with less than twohours of total processing time.

Example 5 Testing Desulfonation on Magnetic Beads

During the development of embodiments of the technology disclosedherein, experiments were performed to compare desulfonation on magneticbeads to desulfonation using a spin column.

Materials

Binding buffer: 3.6 M guanidine thiocyanate, 10 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.0),39% isopropyl alcohol. For example, to make 20 ml of binding buffer, mix12 milliliters of 6 M guanidine thiocyanate, 0.2 milliliter of 1 M TrisHCl (pH 8.0), and 7.8 milliliters of isopropyl alcohol (2-propanol).

Wash buffer: 80% ethanol with 10 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.0). For example, tomake 10 milliliters of wash buffer, mix 8 milliliters of 100% ethanol,0.1 milliliters of 1 M Tris HCl (pH 8.0), and 1.9 water (doubledistilled).

Desulfonation buffer: 0.3 N NaOH in ethanol. For example, to make 10milliliters, mix 7 milliliters of 100% ethanol with 3 milliliters of 1 Nsodium hydroxide (NaOH).

Samples are mixed using any appropriate device or technology to mix orincubate samples at the temperatures and mixing speeds essentially asdescribed below. For example, a Thermomixer (Eppendorf) can be used forthe mixing or incubation of samples. As used herein, “ANB” refers to anassay of the three markers ACTB (beta actin), NDRG4, and BMP3.

Methods Ammonium Hydrogen Sulfite Conversion

-   -   1. In each tube, combine 10 μl DNA, 4.5 μl N NaOH, and 0.5 μl        water (e.g., Fisher 0.1-μm filtered, molecular biology quality)    -   2. Incubate at 42° C. for 20 minutes.    -   3. Add 135 μl of 45% ammonium hydrogen sulfite and incubate at        66° for 1 hour.    -   4. Incubate at 4° C. for 10 minutes.

Desulfonation Using Magnetic Beads

-   -   1. Mix bead stock thoroughly by vortexing bottle for 1 minute.    -   2. Aliquot 50 μl of beads into a 2.0-ml tube (e.g., from USA        Scientific).    -   3. Add 750 μl of binding buffer to the beads.    -   4. Add 150 μl of sulfonated DNA.    -   5. Mix (e.g., 1000 RPM at 30° C. for 30 minutes).    -   6. Place tube on the magnet stand and leave in place for 5        minutes. With the tubes on the stand, remove and discard the        supernatant.    -   7. Add 1,000 μl of wash buffer. Mix (e.g., 1000 RPM at 30° C.        for 3 minutes).    -   8. Place tube on the magnet stand and leave in place for 5        minutes. With the tubes on the stand, remove and discard the        supernatant.    -   9. Add 250 μl of wash buffer. Mix (e.g., 1000 RPM at 30° C. for        3 minutes).    -   10. Place tube on magnetic rack; remove and discard supernatant        after 1 minute.    -   11. Add 200 μl of desulfonation buffer. Mix (e.g., 1000 RPM at        30° C. for 5 minutes).    -   12. Place tube on magnetic rack; remove and discard supernatant        after 1 minute.    -   13. Add 250 μl of wash buffer. Mix (e.g., 1000 RPM at 30° C. for        3 minutes).    -   14. Place tube on magnetic rack; remove and discard supernatant        after 1 minute.    -   15. Add 250 μl of wash buffer to the tube. Mix (e.g., 1000 RPM        at 30° C. for 3 minutes).    -   16. Place tube on magnetic rack; remove and discard supernatant        after 1 minute.    -   17. Incubate all tubes at 30° C. with the lid open for 15        minutes.    -   18. Remove tube from magnetic rack and add 60 μl of elution        buffer directly to the beads.    -   19. Incubate the beads with elution-buffer (e.g., 1000 RPM at        40° C. for 45 minutes).    -   20. Place tubes on magnetic rack; remove and save the        supernatant after 1 minute.

The DNA is ready for immediate analysis or can be stored frozen (e.g.,at or below −20° C.) for later use. For long term storage, store at orbelow −70° C.

Desulfonation Using a Spin Column

Zymo IC spin columns (Zymo Research, Irvine, Calif.) were used accordingto the manufacturer's instructions as follows:

-   -   1. Add 400 μl of binding buffer to a Zymo-Spin IC Column and        place the column into a provided Collection Tube.    -   2. Load 150 μl the sample into the Zymo-Spin IC Column        containing the binding buffer. Close the cap and mix by        inversion.    -   3. Centrifuge at full speed for 30 seconds. Discard the        flow-through.    -   4. Add 100 μl of Zymo M-Wash Buffer to the column. Centrifuge at        full speed for 30 seconds. Discard the flow-through.    -   5. Add 200 μl of Zymo M-Desulfonation Buffer to the column and        let stand at ambient temperature for 15 minutes.    -   6. Centrifuge at full speed for 30 seconds. Discard the        flow-through.    -   7. Add 200 μl of Zymo M-Wash Buffer to the column. Centrifuge at        full speed for 30 seconds. Discard the flow through.    -   8. Add 200 μl of Zymo M-Wash Buffer to the column. Centrifuge at        full speed for 60 seconds. Discard the flow-through.    -   9. Place the column into a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube. Add 60        μl of Elution Buffer directly onto the column matrix.    -   10. Centrifuge at full speed for 30 seconds. Save the        flow-through containing the sample.

The DNA is ready for immediate analysis or can be stored frozen (e.g.,at or below −20° C.) for later use. For long term storage, store at orbelow −70° C.

QuARTS Assay

The QuARTS technology combines a polymerase-based target DNAamplification process with an invasive cleavage-based signalamplification process. The technology is described, e.g., in U.S. Pat.8,361,720, and U.S. patent application Ser. Nos.; 12/946,745;12/946,752, and 61/705,603, each of which is incorporated herein byreference. Fluorescence signal generated by the QuARTS reaction ismonitored in a fashion similar to real-time PCR and permits quantitationof the amount of a target nucleic acid in a sample.

An exemplary QuARTS reaction typically comprises approximately 400-600nmol/l (e.g., 500 nmol/l) of each primer and detection probe,approximately 100 nmol/l of the invasive oligonucleotide, approximately600-700 nmol/l of each FAM (e.g., as supplied commercially by Hologic,Inc.), HEX (e.g., as supplied commercially by BioSearch Technologies,IDT), and Quasar 670 (e.g., as supplied commercially by BioSearchTechnologies) FRET cassettes, 6.675 ng/μl FEN-1 (e.g., Cleavase® (e.g.,2.0), Hologic, Inc.), 1 unit Taq DNA polymerase in a 30 μl reactionvolume (e.g., GoTaq® DNA polymerase, Promega Corp., Madison, Wis.), 10mmol/l 3-(n-morpholino) propanesulfonic acid (MOPS), 7.5 mmol/l MgCl₂,and 250 μmol/l of each dNTP. Exemplary QuARTS cycling conditions consistof an initial incubation at 95° C. for 3 minutes, followed by 10 cyclesof 95° C. for 20 seconds, 67° C. for 30 seconds, and 70° C. for 30seconds. After completion of the 10 cycles, an additional 37 cycles at95° C. for 20 seconds, 53° C. for 1 minute, 70° C. for 30 seconds, and40° C. for 30 seconds are typically performed. In some applications,analysis of the quantification cycle (C_(q)) provides a measure of theinitial number of target DNA strands (e.g., copy number) in the sample.

Reactions are assembled as follows:

-   -   1. Vortex 3× Reaction Mix and 3× ANB Oligo Mix for 3-5 seconds.        Centrifuge each tube for 1-3 seconds.    -   2. Formulate the Master Mix in a 2.0-ml tube (e.g., USA        Scientific) using 10 μl 3× reaction buffer and 10 μl 3× ANB        oligo mix per reaction.    -   3. Vortex the Master Mix for 3-5 seconds. Centrifuge briefly to        collect the sample.    -   4. Aliquot 50 μl of the Master Mix into 8-well 200-μl tube        strips, one for standards and one or more for samples.    -   5. Vortex and centrifuge the standards and samples. Dispense 25        μl into 200-μl strip tubes containing Master Mix.    -   6. Cap strip tubes and vortex well. Spin briefly to collect the        sample.    -   7. Add 30 μl of strip tube contents to a LightCycler LC480 plate        (according to plate layout).    -   8. Seal plate with LightCycler LC480 sealing foil. Centrifuge at        3000 rpm for 2 minutes.    -   9. After centrifugation, place in LightCycler LC480 with the        following cycling conditions and begin the assay:

QuARTS Reaction Parameters Ramp Rate # of Acquisi- Stage Temp/Time (° C.per second) Cycles tion Pre-incubation 95° C./3′ 4.4 1 noneAmplification 1 95° C./20″ 4.4 10 none 64° C./30″ 2.2 none 70° C./30″4.4 none Amplification 2 95° C./20″ 4.4 35 none 53° C./1′ 2.2 single 70°C./30″ 4.4 none Cooling 40° C./30″ 2.2 1 none

Experiments were performed to compare methods for quantifyingmethylation of DNA. DNA from the beta-actin (ACTB) gene was used as theinput of methylated DNA for these experiments. The DNA samples weresulfonated according to the ammonium hydrogen sulfite method describedabove in the Methods, and the samples were subsequently desulfonated andpurified according to either the magnetic bead or spin columndesulfonation methods described above in the Methods. The conditionswere tested using either magnetic beads or spin columns, using thebuffers and procedures described above, with each tested in fourreplicates. The results of this experiment are shown in FIG. 3A and arepeat of this experiment is shown in FIG. 3B. These data show that thebeads produce a substantially higher signal.

Example 6 Testing an Alcohol-Free Binding Buffer

During the development of embodiments of the technology disclosedherein, experiments demonstrated that a binding buffer comprisingguanidine hydrochloride and no alcohol performed better than a guanidinethiocyanate binding buffer comprising alcohol.

Materials

“Gu.HCl” binding buffer: 4.5 to 8.0 M guanidine hydrochloride. Forexample, to make an 8 M guanidine hydrochloride stock solution, 191 g ofsolid guanidine hydrochloride was dissolved in 250 ml of water and mixedat 35° C. for 30 minutes. 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, and 8.0 M solutions ofguanidine hydrochloride were made by mixing 11.25, 12.5, 13.75, 15, or20 ml, respectively, of the 8 M guanidine hydrochloride stock solutionwith enough water to make 20 ml total volume. The pH of the solutionswas approximately 5.5 at both ambient temperature and at 75° C.

Methods

Ammonium hydrogen sulfite conversion was performed as described above inExample 5. The desulfonation reaction using magnetic beads was performedas described above in Example 5, with the substitution of a guanidinehydrochloride binding buffer (4.5-8.0 M) for the guanidine thiocyanatebinding buffer containing alcohol. The desulfonation reaction using aspin column was performed as described above in Example 5. The QuARTSassay was performed as described above for Example 5.

Experiments were performed to compare the product of the bisulfitereaction using binding buffers of 4.5 to 8.0 M guanidine hydrochlorideand magnetic beads. DNA from the beta-actin (ACTB) gene was used as theinput of methylated DNA for these experiments. The DNA samples weresulfonated according to the ammonium hydrogen sulfite method describedabove in the Methods, and the samples were subsequently desulfonated andpurified according to either the magnetic bead or spin columndesulfonation methods described above in the Methods for this Example.The results of this experiment are compiled in FIG. 4.

As shown in FIG. 4, a binding buffer of 6.0 M guanidine hydrochlorideresults in the highest quantification of DNA by QuARTS assay.

Example 7 Testing Guanidine Hydrochloride Binding Buffer

During the development of embodiments of the technology disclosedherein, experiments demonstrated that a binding buffer comprisingguanidine hydrochloride and no alcohol performed better than a guanidinethiocyanate binding buffer comprising alcohol.

Materials

“Gu.HCl” binding buffers: 5.5 to 7.0 M guanidine hydrochloride. 5.5,6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 M solutions of guanidine hydrochloride were made bymixing 13.75, 15, 16.25, or 17.5 ml, respectively, of the 8 M guanidinehydrochloride stock solution as described above with enough water tomake 20 ml total volume. The pH of the solutions was approximately 5.5at both ambient temperature and at 75° C.

Methods

Ammonium hydrogen sulfite conversion was performed as described abovefor Example 5. The desulfonation reaction using magnetic beads wasperformed as described above in Example 5 with the substitution of aguanidine hydrochloride binding buffer (5.5-7.0 M) for the guanidinethiocyanate binding buffer containing alcohol. The desulfonationreaction using a spin column was performed as described above in Example5. The QuARTS assay was performed as described above for Example 5.

Experiments were performed to compare the product of the bisulfitereaction using binding buffers of 5.5 to 7.0 M guanidine hydrochlorideand magnetic beads to the same binding buffer. DNA from the beta-actin(ACTB) gene was used as the input of methylated DNA for theseexperiments. The DNA samples were sulfonated according to the ammoniumhydrogen sulfite method described above in the Methods, and the sampleswere subsequently desulfonated and purified according to either themagnetic bead or spin column desulfonation methods described above inthe Methods for this Example. The results of this experiment arecompiled in FIG. 5.

As shown in FIG. 5, a binding buffer of 6.5-7.0 M guanidinehydrochloride results in the highest quantification of DNA by QuARTSassay.

Example 8 Testing an Isopropanol Desulfonation Buffer

During the development of embodiments of the technology disclosedherein, experiments were performed to test a solution of isopropylalcohol and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) for desulfonation reactions onsilica coated magnetic particles. In particular, data were collected inexperiments comparing desulfonation buffers comprisingisopropanol/sodium hydroxide with desulfonation buffers comprisingethanol/sodium hydroxide.

Initial experiments for silica beads purification employed aM-desulfonation buffer from the EZ-DNA Methylation™ Kit (Zymo research,PN D5002-5). In accordance with conventional methods (see, e.g., Laird,C. D., et al. (2004) “Hairpin-bisulfite PCR: Assessing EpigeneticMethylation Patterns on Complementary Strands of Individual DNAMolecules”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 204-209), a 0.3-N sodiumhydroxide solution in 70% ethanol was initially chosen to be testedagainst the commercial M-Desulfonation Buffer. Experiments wereperformed to compare the conversion, purification, and desulfonation ofACTB strands on beads using the M-Desulfonation Buffer and the 0.3-NNaOH solution in 70% ethanol. The data collected showed an equivalentperformance between the two buffers (Table 1). Table 1 shows ACTB standrecovery after bisulfite treatment using varying desulfonation bufferformulations. The input DNA is 10 μl of captured sDNA converted with 170μl of 68% ammonium bisulfite at 65° C. for 1 hour.

TABLE 1 Desulfonation Buffer Average ACTB strands (N = 2)M-Desulfonation Buffer 1,288 ± 46 0.3N NaOH in 70% EtOH 1,248 ± 17

As a result of these experiments, additional experiments were performedto test the NaOH and ethanol concentrations in the desulfonation buffer.To test various amounts of ethanol and sodium hydroxide in thedesulfonation buffer, experiments were performed using a positive poolof sDNA that was treated with 34% ammonium bisulfite for 1 hour at 68°C. and then bead purified and desulfonated using a series of buffers of0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 N NaOH and 60%, 70%, and 80% ethanol. Results of thisexperiment showed that all buffers tested performed equal and are withinexperimental deviation of each other (FIG. 6). Based on these results,it was decided to use 0.3 N NaOH in 80% ethanol as the desulfonationbuffer.

Further experiments were conducted to test various incubation times forthe desulfonation reaction. These experiments used a positive pool ofsDNA that was treated with 34% ammonium bisulfite for 1 hour at 68° C.,then bead purified and desulfonated using 0.3 N NaOH and 80% ethanol forvarious times. Results show that 10 minutes of desulfonation time issufficient for the reaction (FIG. 7).

During the development of embodiments of the technology provided herein,experiments demonstrated that a desulfonation reagent comprising sodiumhydroxide and ethanol produced a white precipitate after being exposedto air for more than approximately one hour. For example, ongoingexperiments using the 80% ethanol, 0.3-N NaOH desulfonation buffershowed that its prolonged exposure to air caused the formation of awhite precipitate, most likely sodium carbonate, that does not dissolvereadily. In further testing of various ethanol and NaOH concentrationsfor desulfonation and precipitation, reagents ranging from 70% to 90%ethanol and 0.1 to 0.3 N NaOH formed a white precipitate within 3 hoursof air exposure. Such a precipitate could cause problems and/or assayerrors in some embodiments of the technology in which steps areintegrated into an automated workflow. As result, alternativedesulfonation buffer compositions were tested.

Experiments were conducted to test alternative desulfonation buffers aspossible replacements of the ethanol-based buffers. The experimentsdescribed below demonstrated that the use of isopropyl alcohol insteadof ethanol minimized or eliminated the precipitate formation problem.

Various desulfonation solutions comprising isopropyl alcohol as areplacement for ethanol were made and tested by placing them in opencontainers for 3 hours to determine if a precipitate formed. Initialobservations were that upon mixing of the solution, certain isopropylalcohol/NaOH solutions did not form a precipitate but rather formed adistinct bilayer. Table 2 lists the various isopropyl alcoholdesulfonation buffers made and their propensity to form a distinctbilayer.

TABLE 2 Isopropyl alcohol and sodium hydroxide buffers tested %isopropyl Bilayer alcohol NaOH, (N) formation 90% 0.3N Yes 90% 0.2N Yes90% 0.1N Yes 80% 0.3N Yes 80% 0.2N Yes 80% 0.1N Yes, Moderate 70% 0.3NYes 70% 0.2N Yes, Moderate 70% 0.1N No

As a result of testing solutions comprising isopropyl alcohol and sodiumhydroxide for precipitation, further experiments were conducted to testbuffers comprising 70% isopropyl alcohol and 0.1 N NaOH fordesulfonation activity. Comparing the performance of a buffer comprising80% ethanol/0.3 N NaOH versus a buffer comprising 70% isopropylalcohol/0.1 N NaOH on high and low levels (“HD” and “LD,” respectively)of converted synthetic strands showed that the use of 70% isopropylalcohol results in slightly better strand conversion than ethanol (Table3).

For these experiments, HD and LD ultramers (chemically synthesizedstrands of approximately 150 to 200 nucleotides) were used. 200 μl of HDultramers contained 1.7×10⁵ strands of each of the synthetic methylatedNDRG and BMP3 target DNAs and 2×10⁶ strands of each of the ACTB and KRAStargets. LD ultramers contained 5×10⁴ strands of each of the syntheticmethylated NDRG and BMP3 and 2×10⁶ strands of each of the synthetic ACTBand KRAS. Ultramers that went through ABS conversion and are in 34% ABSsolution were mixed with 750 μl of 7 M guanidine HCl and 50 μl of 16μg/μl silica beads and allowed to bind while mixing at 1,000 rpm for 30minutes. Beads were then washed two times, desulfonated for 10 minutesusing 70% isopropyl alcohol/0.1 N NaOH or 80% ethanol (EtOH)/0.3 N NaOHdesulfonation buffer at 30° C., washed twice, and dried at 75° C. for 15minutes followed by elution with 70 μl. In Table 3, average strands andstandard deviations are the result of 23 replicates.

TABLE 3 Isopropyl alcohol-based versus ethanol-based desulfonationbuffers Methylation Marker NDRG4 BMP3 ACTB Desulfonation Buffer EtOH IPAEtOH IPA EtOH IPA HD Average 565 904 349 570 5,337 8,594 UltramersStrands Standard 148 129 82 101 1,445 1,546 Deviations LD Average 128260 82 137 4,359 7,908 Ultramers Strands Standard 44 41 19 33 1,193 929Deviations

To test the effect of changing the desulfonation time for reactionsusing the 70% IPA, 0.1 N NaOH buffer, experiments were performed using apool of positive sDNA to compare desulfonation times of 5, 10, 20, and30 minutes at 30° C. In the experiments, 200 μl of converted sDNA in 34%ABS solution were mixed with 750 μl of 7 M guanidine HCl and 50 μl of 16μg/μl silica beads and allowed to bind while mixing at 1,000 rpm for 30minutes. Beads were then wash two times, desulfonated for various timesusing 70% isopropyl alcohol, 0.1 N NaOH at 30° C., washed twice, anddried at 75° C. for 15 minutes followed by elution with 70 μl of elutionbuffer. Average strands and coefficients of variation are the result ofthree replicates.

Results show that 10 minutes of desulfonation is sufficient and thatmore desulfonation time does not result in significantly higher stranddesulfonation (Table 4).

TABLE 4 Testing desulfonation time using a desulfonation buffer of 70%IPA, 0.1N NaOH Desulfonation Average Strands (N = 3) % CV Time NDRG4BMP3 ACTB NDRG4 BMP3 ACTB  5 minutes 2,668 920 10,788 15% 13% 14% 10minutes 3,084 1,029 12,245 11% 9% 13% 20 minutes 3,141 1,012 12,089 5%5% 6% 30 minutes 3,477 1,112 12,868 6% 5% 10%

Further experiments were conducted to test various reaction conditionsby assessing the effect of minor formulation deviations on theeffectiveness of the desulfonation buffer. In these experiments, variousformulations deviating slightly from the 70% IPA, 0.1 N NaOH buffer weremade and tested. A volume of 200 μl of converted sDNA in 34% ABSsolution were mixed with 750 μl of 7 M guanidine HCl and 50 μl of 16μg/μl silica beads and allowed to bind while mixing at 1,000 rpm for 30minutes. Beads were then washed two times, desulfonated for 10 minutesusing the indicated desulfonation buffer at 30° C., washed twice, anddried at 75° C. for 15 minutes followed by elution with 70 μl. Averagestrands and coefficients of variation are the result of threereplicates. Minor fluctuations in the isopropyl alcohol or NaOHconcentrations have negligible effects on the desulfonation efficiency(Table 5).

TABLE 5 Assessment of minor formulation deviations on desulfonationbuffer effectiveness Desulfonation Average Strands (N = 3) % CV BufferNDRG4 BMP3 ACTB NDRG4 BMP3 ACTB 70% IPA, 0.1N 11,121 3,663 54,250 1% 4%3% NaOH (Contr

70% IPA, 11,092 3,679 56,262 5% 7% 8% 0.125N NaOH 70% IPA, 12,607 4,14763,329 5% 5% 8% 0.075N NaOH 60% IPA, 0.1N 10,526 3,520 52,178 2% 3% 3%NaOH 65% IPA, 0.1N 11,641 3,804 56,618 11% 10% 12% NaOH

indicates data missing or illegible when filed

Based on these results, a formulation of 70% isopropyl alcohol, 0.1 NNaOH was selected for the desulfonation buffer.

Example 9 Protein Solutions to Improve Nucleic Acid Recovery

During the development of embodiments of the technology disclosedherein, data were collected that demonstrated significant variation inthe recovery of DNA (e.g., bisulfite-treated DNA) from capture probes inreaction vessels. The variation observed on reaction plates (e.g.,multiwall plates such as 96 deep-well plates) appeared to be a functionof well location in the plate. In particular, it was demonstrated thatthe recovery of DNA varied top-to-bottom (e.g., as a function of platerow) and/or left-to-right (e.g., as a function of plate column). In someexperiments, the variation in DNA recovery was as much as threefold. Forexample, experiments using 96 replicate samples of a target nucleic acid(e.g., NDRG4) across an entire plate showed that the number of strandsrecovered from the different wells on the plate varied in general fromthe top (row A) to the bottom (row H) of a 96-well plate (see, e.g.,FIG. 8).

Variation in recovery efficiency associated with particular positions ona sample plate is prohibitive to adapting the technology to anautomated, high-throughput format (e.g., on a multi-well plate such as a96 deep-well plate). Attempts to resolve this issue included experimentsperformed using multi-well plates sourced from different manufacturers,changing the order of reagent addition, washing the plates before use(e.g., with NaOH). None of these trials successfully reduced thevariation in strand recovery.

Further experiments were performed to test the effect of addingproteins, e.g., bovine serum albumin (BSA) or casein, to solutions usedto wash captured DNA on the plate or to elute DNA from the capturebeads, as described herein. As discussed below, these tests showed thatBSA and casein reduced or eliminated the aberrations in strand recoveryin the multi-well plates. In some embodiments, the BSA and/or casein isadded to the wash solution used after the capture step and before thehigh-pH elution step.

In some embodiments, the DNA is bisulfite-treated DNA. Experimentsdemonstrated that addition of BSA to a final concentration of about 10ng/μl reduced the variation in recovery observed for bisulfite-treatedpanel of ACTB, NDRG-4, and BMP-3 (“ANB” panel).

For example, in some experiments, the variation was reduced fromapproximately a threefold difference between the top and the bottom ofthe plate to no difference or to approximately a relative ratio of 1.25between the top and the bottom of the plate. See, e.g., FIG. 10, whichcompares the effects of different concentrations of BSA on the recoveryof NDRG4 and KRAS 38A DNA. The data in FIG. 10 shows replicates ofmethylation assay NDRG-4 strands (columns 2-5) and mutation assay KRAS38A strands (columns 8-11). For the methylation assay, a 4 timesincrease in average strands is observed upon addition of BSA, andfurther shows that the addition of BSA decreased the trending down theplate from 3-fold as shown in FIG. 9, to 1.25-fold, as observed bydividing average strands of rows H by row A in FIG. 10.

This reduction in variation was from approximately 300% to 30%. Furtherexperiments to test BSA concentrations showed that BSA alleviated theobserved variation at a BSA concentration of approximately 27 ng/μl ormore and, moreover, and that strand recovery was increased withincreasing BSA concentrations up to approximately 100 ng/μl, as shownbelow:

ng/μL Avg Strands % CV BSA ANB KRAS ANB KRAS FAM 28 6960 21460 19% 21%55 7296 24928 15% 18% 900 6738 31856 11% 16% 1800 4383 26150 11% 26% HEX250 3146 14423 16% 17% 500 3189 18379 11% 13% 900 3443 23000 11% 16%1800 2280 20319  6% 17% QSR 250 64815 120769 18% 20% 500 80171 12597718% 14% 900 70401 163284 15% 13% 1800 56421 143850  9% 12%

The panels and fluorophores are as described for FIG. 11. These data areaveraged signals for 46 QuARTS assay reactions.

In other experiments performed to test the effect of casein inalleviating the observed variation, data collected demonstrated thatadding casein, e.g., alkaline denatured casein, to one or more solutionsat a concentration of 0.001% to 0.01% (e.g., comparing 0.001%, 0.003%,0.006%, and 0.01%) reduced or eliminated the variation of DNA strandrecovery with well position and an increased DNA strand recovery wasobserved with increased casein concentration. In some experimentsdirectly comparing the effects of BSA and casein, data showed thatcasein doubles strand recovery compared to BSA. See, e.g., FIG. 11.Additional experiments demonstrated that pre--washing and rinsing themulti-well plates with a BSA solution (e.g., prior to DNA capture) alsodecreased the variation.

In some experiments, this problem of DNA strand recovery varying as afunction of well position in a multi-well plate was associated withprocessing (e.g., bisulfite conversion and/or purification, elution) ofDNA of approximately 200 nucleotides or less in a multi-well format(e.g., in a deep-well plate such as a 96 deep-well plate). As thisphenomenon was unexpected, the physical basis of the systematicvariation is not known and the mechanism of minimizing or eliminatingthe variation by BSA and/or casein is not known. However, anunderstanding of the basis for the variation and/or the mechanism bywhich it is minimized or eliminated by BSA and/or casein is not requiredto practice the technology. Without being bound by theory, oneexplanation may be that the BSA and/or casein minimizes or eliminatesthe binding of DNA to well surfaces that vary, e.g., due to themanufacturing process and/or defects in the plates.

In summary, during the development of embodiments of the technologyrelated to automation integration (e.g., performing capture, washing,elution, conversion, and purification on an automated instrument and 96deep-well format), a systematic (e.g., top-to-bottom, left-to-right)trending pattern of varying strand recovery (e.g., up to approximatelythreefold) from capture probes was observed for strands of DNA (e.g.,bisulfite-converted synthetic DNA). Various solutions were tested anddata suggested that the addition of BSA or casein minimized oreliminated variation in DNA strand recovery and increased recovery ofDNA strands, e.g., eluted from capture probes.

All publications and patents mentioned in the above specification areherein incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.Various modifications and variations of the described compositions,methods, and uses of the technology will be apparent to those skilled inthe art without departing from the scope and spirit of the technology asdescribed. Although the technology has been described in connection withspecific exemplary embodiments, it should be understood that theinvention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specificembodiments. Indeed, various modifications of the described modes forcarrying out the invention that are obvious to those skilled inbiochemistry, molecular biology, clinical medicine, genomics, or relatedfields are intended to be within the scope of the following claims.

We claim:
 1. A method for treating DNA to quantify DNA methylation, themethod comprising contacting a DNA with a sulfonation reagent to producesulfonated DNA, and binding said sulfonated DNA to a magnetic bead in analcohol-free binding buffer.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said DNAis contacted with said sulfonation reagent to produce a mixturecomprising sulfonated DNA, and wherein said mixture is combined withsaid magnetic bead in the presence of said alcohol-free binding buffer.3. The method of claim 1 wherein the sulfonation reagent is ammoniumhydrogen sulfite.
 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the alcohol-freebinding buffer comprises guanidine hydrochloride.
 5. The method of claim1 wherein the binding buffer comprises approximately 7.0 M guanidinehydrochloride.
 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the DNA consists of 200or fewer bases in length.
 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the DNA issingle stranded.
 8. The method of claim 1 further comprising contactingsulfonated DNA bound to said bead with a desulfonation reagent toproduce converted DNA, and eluting said converted DNA to provide ananalytical sample.
 9. The method of claim 8 wherein the amount of DNAcontacted with said sulfonation reagent is substantially the same as theamount of DNA in the analytical sample.
 10. The method of claim 8wherein a cytosine, if present in the DNA prior to sulfonation, isconverted to a uracil in the DNA in said converted DNA
 11. The method ofclaim 8 wherein a methylcytosine, if present in the DNA prior tosulfonation, is not converted to a uracil in said converted DNA.
 12. Themethod of claim 1 wherein the magnetic bead is a silica-coated magneticbead.
 13. The method of claim 8, wherein the process of producing saidconverted DNA is completed in 4 hours or less.
 14. The method of claim8, wherein the process of producing said converted DNA is completed in 3hours or less.
 15. The method of claim 8, wherein the process ofproducing said converted DNA is completed in 2 hours or less.
 16. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the desulfonation reagent comprisesisopropanol.
 17. The method of claim 1, wherein the desulfonationreagent comprises approximately 70% isopropanol and approximately 0.1 Nsodium hydroxide.
 18. The method of claim 1, wherein said magnetic beadand said DNA are in a sample vessel, and wherein said method comprises astep of exposing said sample vessel containing said magnetic bead andsaid DNA to a solution comprising at least one of bovine serum albuminor casein.
 19. The method of claim 18, wherein said solution comprisesbetween about 10 ng/μl and 100 ng/μl bovine serum albumin.
 20. Themethod of claim 18 wherein said solution comprises between about 0.001%to about 0.01% casein.
 21. A kit for treating DNA comprising: a) anammonium hydrogen sulfite sulfonation reagent; b) a magnetic bead; c) aguanidine hydrochloride alcohol-free binding buffer; d) a wash buffer;e) desulfonation reagent; and f) an elution buffer.
 22. The kit of claim21 wherein the binding buffer comprises approximately 6.5-7.5 Mguanidine hydrochloride.
 23. The kit of claim 21, wherein thedesulfonation reagent comprises isopropanol.
 24. The method of claim 23,wherein the desulfonation reagent comprises approximately 70%isopropanol and approximately 0.1 N sodium hydroxide.
 25. The kit ofclaim 21, further comprising a solution containing at least one ofbovine serum albumin and/or casein.